WCAG 2.2 vs. WCAG 3.0: Navigating the Future of Digital Accessibility

calendar icon 12 November 2025
clock icon 5 minutes read
WCAG 2.2 Vs. WCAG 3.0
Share article

Digital products are becoming more complex, and accessibility standards must evolve with them. The Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) remain the main reference for creating inclusive online experiences. Today, WCAG 2.2 is the official and legally recognized standard. The upcoming WCAG 3.0, known as the Silver project, introduces a broader and more flexible approach that focuses on real user outcomes.

Understanding both standards helps organizations plan for long-term accessibility.

WCAG 2.2: The Current Compliance Standard

WCAG 2.2 was released in 2023 and is the latest stable version of the WCAG 2.x family. It is widely used for audits, certification, and legal compliance. The structure is based on four principles: content must be perceivable, operable, understandable, and robust.

WCAG 2.2 continues to use three conformance levels: A, AA, and AAA. Level AA is the most common requirement in regulations worldwide.

The strength of WCAG 2.2 is its clear, testable rules. These rules describe what must be done to make digital content accessible. They cover technical areas like text contrast, keyboard navigation, input labels, and predictable interface behavior. Auditors can evaluate these requirements with automated tools and manual checks, producing a simple pass or fail result.

However, WCAG 2.2 is strict and sometimes narrow. It focuses on traditional web content and does not fully address modern interfaces like voice assistants, AI-driven apps, or immersive AR/VR products. It also leans toward checklist compliance rather than the full quality of the user experience.

WCAG 3.0 (Silver): A Draft Focused on Real User Experience

WCAG 3.0 is still a draft, and its final version may change. But its direction shows a major shift. Instead of looking only at technical rules, WCAG 3.0 aims to measure how well a product actually works for users with different needs.

The draft expands the scope beyond websites. It plans to cover mobile apps, voice interfaces, immersive technologies, and dynamic or AI-generated interfaces. This reflects how people use digital products today.

A key difference is the proposed evaluation model. WCAG 3.0 suggests moving away from a strict pass/fail system. Instead, it explores scoring that reflects partial improvements and ongoing progress. It also introduces qualitative factors such as clarity, ease of navigation, and the overall user journey. These ideas are still evolving, but they represent a more flexible and modern approach.

The main value of WCAG 3.0 is its focus on continuous improvement. It encourages teams to integrate accessibility into design and development from the start. If adopted, it will help organizations build more inclusive and future-ready products.

WCAG 2.2 vs. WCAG 3.0 Comparison Table

 

WCAG 2.2

WCAG 3.0 (Draft)

Status

Final, active standard

Early draft, work in progress

 

Main Purpose

Technical and legal compliance

Real-world accessibility and usability

 

Evaluation Model

Binary: pass or fail

Proposed scoring with partial results

 

Scope

Websites, web apps, documents

Broader: mobile apps, VUIs, AR/VR, AI interfaces

 

Principles

POUR framework

New structure with guidelines and outcomes

 

Focus

Specific technical requirements

User experience, clarity, efficiency, satisfaction

 

Use in Audits

Fully supported and required

Not used yet; not recognized legally

 

Strength

Strong, stable, testable rules

Flexible, scalable approach for modern tech

Limitation

Rigid and web-centric

Not finalized; may evolve significantly

 

Key Takeaway: WCAG 2.2 Today, WCAG 3.0 Tomorrow

WCAG 2.2 remains the required standard for compliance. It provides a reliable set of technical rules and is fully supported by legal frameworks and audit practices. WCAG 3.0 is a vision for the future. It highlights the importance of real user experience and flexible evaluation across many types of digital environments. Organizations should continue following WCAG 2.2 but start preparing for the broader, user-focused mindset introduced by WCAG 3.0.

Don’t wait for WCAG 3.0, make your products inclusive today and open new opportunities for tomorrow. With UKAD’s WCAG 2.2 audit and accessibility compliance services, you can easily and confidently make your digital products user-friendly across all devices, for any needs.

Nataliia Shovkova
Nataliia Shovkova
QA Engineer

Nataliia is a detail-oriented QA Engineer, experienced in QA for diverse applications, covering functional, regression, and integration testing. She ensures software quality and reliability through careful test design, structured regression coverage, and thorough bug tracking. Passionate about user experience and accessibility, Nataliia validates that every feature is seamless and inclusive. She combines critical thinking, clear documentation, and teamwork to continuously improve QA processes and deliver high-quality products.

Share article

Rate this article!

Your opinion matters to us

Rating: 5.0/5