How to Run an Effective Web Accessibility Audit

calendar icon 11 November 2025
clock icon 5 minutes read
How To Run An Effective Web Accessibility Audit
Share article

Creating accessible digital products is not just a legal requirement, it is good design. A web accessibility audit helps ensure that everyone, including users with access needs, can use your website or app with ease. It checks how well your product meets the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.2, the global standard for inclusive digital experiences.

Understanding the Goal

The goal of an accessibility audit is simple: find and fix the barriers that stop people from perceiving, operating, or understanding your content. A proper audit looks at every part of your digital product, from design and content to code and user interactions.

An audit typically covers:

  • Design: color contrast, spacing, visual hierarchy.

  • Content: language clarity, heading structure, alt text.

  • Code and Semantics: HTML validity, ARIA roles.

  • Interaction: keyboard navigation, focus order.

  • Multimedia: captions, transcripts, playback controls.

Preparing for the Audit

Before starting, clearly define what you will test, such as specific pages, templates, or key user flows. Then identify which WCAG 2.2 criteria and level (A, AA, or AAA) apply. Set up your test environment with the latest browsers (Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge) and assistive technologies like NVDA, JAWS, and VoiceOver. Make sure you can navigate with a keyboard alone.


Choose reliable tools such as axe DevTools, WAVE, and Lighthouse for automated scans, along with contrast analyzers and HTML validators. Testing mobile applications also requires platform-specific utilities: Google Accessibility Scanner for Android solutions and Xcode Accessibility Tools for iOS. Finally, decide on your reporting format so each issue includes an ID, WCAG reference, description, severity, and recommended fix.

What to Check

Structure and Semantics

Your page structure sets the foundation for accessibility. Make sure headings follow a logical hierarchy, use proper landmarks (header, main, footer), and validate all HTML. Only use ARIA roles when necessary and ensure lists, tables, and forms use semantic tags.

Text and Content

Good content helps everyone. Use clear page titles, descriptive link text, and accurate alt text for images. Avoid placing text inside images and declare the correct page language to assist screen readers.

Visual Design

Test color contrast ratios (4.5:1 for normal text, 3:1 for large text) and ensure users can resize text up to 200% without breaking the layout. Do not rely on color alone to show errors or states, and make sure focus indicators are visible and consistent.

Keyboard and Interaction

Every feature should work with a keyboard. Check that tab order follows a logical path and focus never gets trapped in modals. Add "Skip to main content" links and ensure dynamic elements like menus or accordions communicate changes to assistive tech.

Forms and Inputs

Each input needs a visible, programmatically linked label. Provide examples or help text where needed, and make error messages clear and specific. Validation should not depend on color and must work with screen readers.

Multimedia and Animations

Include captions for videos, transcripts for audio, and audio descriptions for key visuals. Users should be able to pause or stop motion and control autoplay. Avoid flashing content and offer options to reduce or disable motion.

Navigation and Orientation

Keep navigation consistent across pages. Use breadcrumbs or sitemaps to help users stay oriented. Menus should be accessible by both touch and keyboard, and links should look and behave the same everywhere.

Error Handling and Feedback

When users take an action, such as submitting a form, provide clear and accessible feedback. Use ARIA live regions for real-time updates and summarize errors so screen readers can announce them. For irreversible actions, add a confirmation or undo step.

Compatibility and Performance

Test your site on various browsers, devices, and assistive tools. Ensure pages load quickly and use progress indicators for long processes.

How to Test

A thorough audit combines several methods:

  • Automated Testing: run scans to find obvious issues.

  • Manual Expert Review: test keyboard navigation and screen reader output.

  • Assistive Technology Testing: perform real tasks using tools like NVDA or VoiceOver.

  • User Testing: observe users with disabilities in real scenarios.

  • Regression Testing: recheck important flows after fixes.

How to Report Issues

An effective Web Accessibility Audit Report must be a comprehensive document designed to inform both leadership and technical teams. It begins with a high-level Executive Summary that immediately states the conformance status (e.g., "Partially meets WCAG 2.2 Level AA"), presents key metrics like the total number of issues, and highlights the most critical blockers. This is followed by a clear Scope and Methodology section, detailing the specific WCAG version, target conformance level, and the testing environment, including the browsers and Assistive Technologies used. The core of the report is the Detailed Findings (Issue Log), where every defect is meticulously documented with a unique ID, the exact WCAG Reference that failed, an assigned Severity level, a detailed Technical Description of the problem, and a clear, actionable Recommended Fix for developers. This structured approach ensures managers can assess risk quickly, while technical teams receive the precise guidance needed for efficient remediation.

This is how your Web Accessibility Audit may look:

Section

Component

Purpose & Detail

Audience Focus

I. Executive Summary

Overall Conformance Status

Clear statement on whether the target WCAG level (e.g., AA) was met.

Management

 

Key Metrics & Severity Breakdown

Total issues found, unique failures, and a visual representation of issue priority (Critical, Serious, Moderate).

Management

 

Top 3 High-Impact Issues

Highlights the most severe defects that block essential user flows.

Management

 

High-Level Remediation Plan

Initial guidance on the immediate next steps and prioritization.

Management

II. Scope & Methodology

WCAG Standard & Level

Explicitly states the version (e.g., WCAG 2.2) and the required conformance level (e.g., AA).

All

 

Tested Assets (Scope)

Lists all specific URLs, templates, and key user flows included in the audit.

All

 

Test Environment Details

Details the operating systems, browser versions, and screen resolutions used during testing.

Technical

 

Assistive Technologies Used

Lists the screen readers and input devices used (e.g., NVDA, VoiceOver, Keyboard-only navigation).

Technical

III. Detailed Findings

Unique Issue ID & Location

A sequential tracking number and the exact page/component where the defect was found.

Technical

 

WCAG Success Criteria Reference

The precise criteria that failed (e.g., 2.4.7 Focus Visible (AA)).

Technical

 

Severity & User Impact

An assigned priority (Critical, Serious, etc.) and an explanation of who is affected and how.

All

 

Technical Description

A detailed explanation of the defect, referencing code or structure.

Technical

 

Actionable Recommended Fix

Clear, step-by-step instructions (with code snippets, if possible) on how to resolve the issue.

Technical

 

Visual Evidence (Screenshot/Video)

Proof of the defect (especially useful for visual issues like contrast or focus).

All

IV. Review & Delivery

No False Positives

Confirmation that all reported issues are genuine defects and not tool errors.

Technical

 

Accessible Report Format

Assurance that the report itself is delivered in an accessible format (e.g., tagged PDF).

All

Need Expert Support?

At UKAD, we combine technical expertise with a human approach to accessibility. Our QA specialists carry out WCAG 2.2 audits, guide remediation efforts, and help teams build ongoing accessibility monitoring.

We test your digital products with both automated tools and real assistive technologies so you get results that are practical and ready to act on.

Request an Accessibility Audit!

Nataliia Shovkova
Nataliia Shovkova
QA Engineer

Nataliia is a detail-oriented QA Engineer, experienced in QA for diverse applications, covering functional, regression, and integration testing. She ensures software quality and reliability through careful test design, structured regression coverage, and thorough bug tracking. Passionate about user experience and accessibility, Nataliia validates that every feature is seamless and inclusive. She combines critical thinking, clear documentation, and teamwork to continuously improve QA processes and deliver high-quality products.

Share article

Rate this article!

Your opinion matters to us

Rating: 5.0/5